Eri Hozumi vs Dan Ni Wang Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L L L L W L
Form
L L L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Hozumi 1 - 0 Wang
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hozumi winning 2 and Wang winning 0. The last match between Hozumi and Wang was at the W25 Bhopal, 19-11-2019, First, Hard with Eri Hozumi getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Eri Hozumi | 1 |
| Dan Ni Wang | 0 |
W25 Bhopal(19-11-2019)
6
1
6
1
| Hozumi | Stats | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 870 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 144 | Highest Rank | 685 |
| 31 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (296-262) | Career Total W/L | 38% (94-152) |
| $178,521 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Eri Hozumi
Player
Dan Ni Wang
42%
(
15 of
36)
1st Serve %
32%
(
13 of
41)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:52:0 | Average Match Time | 0:52:0 |
| 42% (15/36) | 1st Serve % | 32% (13/41) |
| 93% (14/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 67% (14/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (11/28) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (24/41) | Return Points Win % | 22% (8/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Eri Hozumi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Eri Hozumi
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | n/p | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Eri Hozumi
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Eri Hozumi
39%
(
20 of
51)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lina Glushko
Player
Eri Hozumi
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Eri Hozumi
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Shiho Akita
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Beatrice Gumulya
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Rianna Alame
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
16 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arianne Hartono
Player
Eri Hozumi
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Ni Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Eri Hozumi
Player
Dan Ni Wang
42%
(
15 of
36)
1st Serve %
32%
(
13 of
41)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Ni Wang
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
40%
(
21 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
63)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlada Katic
Player
Dan Ni Wang
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Ni Wang
Player
Mana Kawamura
34%
(
23 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Dan Ni Wang
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
32%
(
17 of
53)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiayu Xu
Player
Dan Ni Wang
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
43%
(
39 of
91)
1
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
52%
(
39 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhuoma Ni Ma
Player
Dan Ni Wang
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (296/262) | Win/Loss | 38% (94/152) |
| 52% (664/604) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (209/329) |
| 51% (5965/5676) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (2137/2571) |
| 51% (184/174) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (78/121) |
| 55% (43/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 30% (10/23) |
| 44% (21/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (5/7) |
| 65% (48/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 455 | Aces Total | 273 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 872 | Total Double Faults | 433 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 585.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 443 |
| 64% (14609/22780) | 1st Serve % | 52% (3775/7193) |
| 59% (8686/14609) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2373/3775) |
| 45% (3690/8171) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1496/3418) |
| 47% (1391/2959) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (322/775) |
| 46% (10474/22753) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2913/7110) |
| 41% (11/16) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (25/40) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (218/176) | Challenger W/L | 42% (35/49) |
| 61% (39/25) | Futures W/L | 37% (59/102) |
| 53% (289/547) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (91/241) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 57% (67/118) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 29% (10/34) |
| 51% (83/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (25/51) |
| 85% (298/252) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (90/79) |
| 15% (298/44) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (90/10) |
| 15% (259/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (154/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
